How does peer acceptance influence behavior

Issues of peer acceptance should be addressed as early as possible in order to prevent loss of self-confidence and self-esteem. In addition to providing direct social skills training or counseling for the child with peer acceptance problems, parents and teachers can create opportunities for non-threatening social interaction to occur. Though children should never be forced to play together this can create the rejection it is intended to remedy , popular and less-popular preschoolers can be encouraged to interact with one another.

For example, a less sociable child may be encouraged to answer and ask questions of others. Older children should be provided opportunities to interact in smaller groups and in one-on-one situations, where it may be easier to try out new behaviors and make up for social mistakes. Shy or withdrawn children can be encouraged to develop outside interests that will place them in structured contact with others.

In school, peer helping programs and collaborative learning provide opportunities for popular and less-popular children to work together. Ideally, collaboration should highlight the less-popular students' strengths, such as special interests and talents, rather than weaknesses. At any age, the smallest positive change in behavior should be reinforced with attention and praise. Asher, S. Coie, eds. Peer Rejection in Childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press, Most infants and toddlers meet peers on a regular basis, and some experience long-lasting relationships with particular peers that start at birth.

In the second year of life, they show both prosocial and aggressive behaviour with peers, with some toddlers clearly being more aggressive than others. Although many investigators have described early peer relations, relatively little attention has been paid to the emotional, cognitive and behavioural skills that underlie the ability to interact harmoniously with peers.

Children with developmental disorders who are impaired in joint attention skills 6 and imitation 7 and children with limited vocabularies 2 may be at special risk, which may account for some of the problematic peer relations in mainstreamed preschool classrooms. A great deal of research on peer relations in early childhood has used sociometric methods, in which children name those peers they like and sometimes dislike.

These methods show that some children are accepted by their peers, whereas others are either actively rejected or ignored. Studies show that highly aggressive children are not accepted by their peers 9 but this may depend on gender. There are clear links between very early peer relations and those that occur later in childhood. For example, toddlers who were able to engage in complex play with peers were more competent in dealing with other children in the preschool years and in middle childhood.

Children who were without friends in kindergarten were still having difficulties dealing with peers at the age of However, the roots of peer rejection lie in the earliest years of childhood, and peer rejection is associated with educational underachievement, even when many other causal influences are taken into account.

Implications for Policy-Makers and Service-Providers The evidence just reviewed challenges long-held beliefs about the importance of peers in early development. Prosocial action in very early childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry ;40 6 Physical aggression and expressive vocabulary in month-old twins. Developmental Psychology ;39 2 Child Development ;71 2 Developmental Psychology ;39 1 It can help to compromise with your child.

Letting your child have some independence can reduce the chance of more risky choices. Having friends and feeling connected to a group gives teenagers a sense of belonging and being valued, which helps them develop confidence. Some mood and behaviour changes are normal in pre-teens and teenagers. But if your child seems to be in a low mood for more than 2 weeks, or their low mood gets in the way of things they normally enjoy, they might need support for their mental health.

Cooperation in the classroom 8th ed. Kelly, A. Very young adolescents and alcohol: Evidence of a unique susceptibility to peer alcohol use. Addictive Behaviors, 37, Pettigrew, T. Intergroup contact theory.

Annual Review of Psychology, 49, How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 6 , Roseth, C. Psychological Bulletin, , — Steinberg, L. Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, — Tobler, N.

School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: meta-analysis. Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, Van Ryzin, M. From antisocial behavior to violence: A model for the amplifying role of coercive joining in adolescent friendships.

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, Adolescent deviant peer clustering as an amplifying mechanism underlying the progression from early substance use to late adolescent dependence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, Enlisting peer cooperation in the service of alcohol use prevention in middle school. Child Development. Peer influence processes as mediators of effects of a middle school substance use prevention program: A randomized trial.

Manuscript in preparation. Cooperative learning in middle school: A means to improve peer relations and reduce victimization, bullying, and related outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. Wilson, D. School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17, Originally published in May Phi Delta Kappan 99 8 , All rights reserved.

Useful insight for those of us who work with groups that have lots of learning difficulties, including adults. Suggests that gamification might benefit from being team-based rather than for competiton between individuals.